There was a time not too long ago when I got pretty much everything that I worked to get. It seemed simple and was in line with the lie that middle-class society insisted was true: Work hard, and it'll pay off.
Then I reached the ugly age of 22 when I entered the real world and realized that this whole "working hard" theory is a stinkier than a fresh pile of horse manure on Central Park South. You need to be connected... well, actually your parents need to be connected. Mine, like most immigrant parents, are unconnected. (And respiratorily challenged.) I could go down the infantile road of bitching and whining, but I'm going to take the decidedly more mature (and definitely not masochistic) route of looking over past rejection letters and sharing them with the world for all to see.
(Note: I have four rejection letters that actually came in the post. These do not include the people with whom I've interviewed but never bothered to contact me later... situations which usually result in an awkward-but-necessary phone call that is made even though I already know the answer.)
FEBRUARY 6, 2006
"We appreciate your interest in being part of our team, as well as the time you spent talking with us. Unfortunately we will not be extending an offer to you... We wish you well in your pursuit of a position that makes full use of your skills, abilities, and experience."
Analysis -- This guy's intern couldn't be bothered with folding the letter into good thirds because he had to do one of those mini-folds to shove it into the envelope. Boo! I appreciate the fact that they were so upfront ("we will not be extending an offer to you") but did they REALLY have to do that snide "makes full use of your skills, abilities, and experience"? Uh. Screw you.
MARCH 1, 2006
"Upon careful consideration, we have decided to offer the position of Production Editorial Assistant to another candidate. However, I will keep your resume on file for 30 days... I wish you success in your job search."
Analysis -- No backhanded compliments. Very upfront rejection. I think this is my favorite. Everyone should follow this company's example.
APRIL 11, 2006
"It was a difficult decision, but unfortunately we have decided to pursue a candidate whose background more closely matches our position requirements. As we assess our needs for future opportunities, we will review your qualifications again."
Analysis -- Eh. Everybody knows that this whole "we will review your qualifications again" is total excrement, but this isn't so bad. Close second behind the previous letter.
MAY 10, 2006
"The resume you submitted via [a current employee] has been referred to me. While your background and experience are impressive, unfortunately, at this specific time we do not have any openings that match your qualifications. We will certainly keep your resume on file for possible future openings."
Analysis -- Why do companies keep telling you reassuringly that they'll keep your resume on file? Is that supposed to make me feel better? "Woo, they rejected me, but my resume is sitting there, i.e. crumpled somewhere in yesterday's recycling."
-----
In conclusion, this post accomplished nothing besides making me sound like a big baby. :-) This is Day Three of my sabbatical. I need plans...